Well, I say they can and they do. When you enter the lovely world of voice prompts after calling customer service, you get to choose whether you are calling about your TV service or internet service.
To me, that is classifying customers. When you have services available to those intelligent enough to find your back door services, such as Twitter and @comcastcares, you are classifying customers.
When you get someone on the phone from Comcast and you obviously know more than they do about the problem, they should transfer you to someone who does have a clue, and perhaps even a reasonable resolution or hint of one.
When there is a problematic router in Chicago, how does it help:
- The customer?
- The customer service department? (as the customer will stay angry and keep calling)
- The shareholders?
- The environment?
Why send a technican to a customer's house a week after the problem is reported only to discover the problem was 500 miles away, when they information could have been received and acted upon during the initial customer service phone call?
To say you can't classify customers and provide the same stupid routine repeatedly, i.e., a customer calls and gets someone that does not listen to what the customer is saying about the problem and insists on just scheduling a service call, even when the customer TELLS them the problem is with a specific Comcast router, is just bad business.
Then, to further my irritation, I have to see a resource such as @comcastcares telling me Comcast can't classify customers to know which ones are geeks and which ones truly don't know what the problem is. That is total crap.
If Comcast is capable of creating a back door resource like that, they are certainly capable of creating a capable staff who can answer the service calls directly, when someone points out a real problem.